🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 606+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Wakmann Vintage watch

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (606 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$41.65
$69.42
Sale
βœ“ at no charge distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Wakmann watch 17 JewelsRuns magnificent.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wakmann Vintage watch

Vintage Wakmann watch 17 Jewels
Runs magnificent.​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 444917

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Watches

Original Price: $69.42 USD

Sale Price: $41.65 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3473 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top Wakmann Vintage watch ever​
It’s not the leading product I’ve owned, but the Wakmann Vintage watch is decent.
1 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely cherish it
After several use, the Wakmann Vintage watch works fine so I’m okay with it.
8 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
For the price, the Wakmann Vintage watch is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
18 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
Absolutely superb
remarkably good experience with Wakmann Vintage watch.
31 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb Wakmann Vintage watch
Honestly, it works well enough so no complaints.
26 people found this helpful