๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 912+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.4 out of 5 (912 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
โœ“ at no charge distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Three piece set. #dishes #glass #collectibles

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express delivery

โ†ฉ๏ธ
basic Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set

Three piece set.

#dishes #glass #collectibles

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 626415

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Teapots

Original Price: $75 USD

Sale Price: $45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3989 reviews

AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Cleveland, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply incredible
So far, the 3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set is hassle-complimentary to use which feels reasonable.
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
impeccable in every way
The 3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set wasnโ€™t exactly what I imagined, but it works well enough.
27 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkably happy
Not impressed, not disappointed. The 3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set is okay.
32 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
magnificent choice​
After certain use, the 3 piece Paul Cardew rooster set performs as expected and Iโ€™m satisfied.
4 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott
2 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
finest
After various use, it works as described which is good enough.
1 people found this helpful